Engineering Case Study

Recover the system without promoting the archive.

Engineering case study: Lazarus-style recovery separates historical evidence, schema conformance, runtime reconstruction and promotion gates.

Lazarus recovery and hardening

The dangerous move in recovery is treating historical or damaged material as current authority. Lazarus reconstructs source paths, schema state and runtime evidence separately, so recovered state is promoted only after explicit conformance and acceptance.

Problem

Historical and damaged system material can be mistaken for current authority during recovery.

Method

Source paths, schema state and runtime evidence are reconstructed separately.

Result

Recovered state can be promoted only after explicit conformance and acceptance.

Boundary

Recovery evidence may explain lineage without automatically becoming live runtime truth.

Current Evidence

Separated concerns

Source paths, schema conformance and runtime evidence are reconstructed independently.

Promotion gate

Recovered state stays held until conformance and acceptance pass.

Auditable return

Schema freeze, gaps and promotion decisions are recorded as evidence.